<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenCL?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aras-p.info/blog/2008/06/10/opencl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aras-p.info/blog/2008/06/10/opencl/</link>
	<description>Random thoughts of a triangle pusher</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 10:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aras Pranckevičius</title>
		<link>http://aras-p.info/blog/2008/06/10/opencl/#comment-12110</link>
		<dc:creator>Aras Pranckevičius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aras-p.info/blog/?p=175#comment-12110</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s going to &lt;i&gt;be&lt;/i&gt; CUDA either. Just something similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to <i>be</i> CUDA either. Just something similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Langer</title>
		<link>http://aras-p.info/blog/2008/06/10/opencl/#comment-12107</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Langer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aras-p.info/blog/?p=175#comment-12107</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it will be &quot;only&quot; a rebranded CUDA. That&#039;s just not Apple. Of course it will be technically similar, cuz they won&#039;t reinvent the wheel on this one. But it&#039;s not going to be a licensed CUDA or something as I don&#039;t see Apple kicking AMD/ATI&#039;s butt as long as competition is useful for them. Apple made an art form out of making things good and thinking it through to the end. Haven&#039;t seen CUDA&#039;s API part by now, but it would surprise me if Apple won&#039;t do their own. In the end: it&#039;s gonna be open somehow ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it will be &#8220;only&#8221; a rebranded CUDA. That&#8217;s just not Apple. Of course it will be technically similar, cuz they won&#8217;t reinvent the wheel on this one. But it&#8217;s not going to be a licensed CUDA or something as I don&#8217;t see Apple kicking AMD/ATI&#8217;s butt as long as competition is useful for them. Apple made an art form out of making things good and thinking it through to the end. Haven&#8217;t seen CUDA&#8217;s API part by now, but it would surprise me if Apple won&#8217;t do their own. In the end: it&#8217;s gonna be open somehow ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

