<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenCL?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aras-p.info/blog/2008/06/10/opencl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aras-p.info/blog/2008/06/10/opencl/</link>
	<description>Random thoughts of a triangle pusher</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 21:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aras Pranckevičius</title>
		<link>http://aras-p.info/blog/2008/06/10/opencl/comment-page-1/#comment-12110</link>
		<dc:creator>Aras Pranckevičius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aras-p.info/blog/?p=175#comment-12110</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I don't think it's going to &lt;i&gt;be&lt;/i&gt; CUDA either. Just something similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to <i>be</i> CUDA either. Just something similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Langer</title>
		<link>http://aras-p.info/blog/2008/06/10/opencl/comment-page-1/#comment-12107</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Langer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aras-p.info/blog/?p=175#comment-12107</guid>
		<description>I don't think it will be "only" a rebranded CUDA. That's just not Apple. Of course it will be technically similar, cuz they won't reinvent the wheel on this one. But it's not going to be a licensed CUDA or something as I don't see Apple kicking AMD/ATI's butt as long as competition is useful for them. Apple made an art form out of making things good and thinking it through to the end. Haven't seen CUDA's API part by now, but it would surprise me if Apple won't do their own. In the end: it's gonna be open somehow ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it will be &#8220;only&#8221; a rebranded CUDA. That&#8217;s just not Apple. Of course it will be technically similar, cuz they won&#8217;t reinvent the wheel on this one. But it&#8217;s not going to be a licensed CUDA or something as I don&#8217;t see Apple kicking AMD/ATI&#8217;s butt as long as competition is useful for them. Apple made an art form out of making things good and thinking it through to the end. Haven&#8217;t seen CUDA&#8217;s API part by now, but it would surprise me if Apple won&#8217;t do their own. In the end: it&#8217;s gonna be open somehow ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
